Monday, October 26, 2009

The Preannouncement of the True Developments in the Basic Issues of Greece with Turkey and Skopje

By now, for every thinking person, all the plan of the foreign policy that is going to be imposed on the Hellenic Nation and State by George Papandreou, if of course he is allowed to remain in the PM seat, has been rendered clear. His signs of action have been given anew, repeatedly and clearly based his positioning on issues and subjects that share common ground or points with the ones we are dealing with as well as with those that are very likely going to occur, out of the blue for the Citizens who naively and in trust no foreign affairs minister or after-junta PM has earned, do not watch out for the hints G. Papandreou is giving and the principles he says he is following. It is however, not going to be out of the blue, but expected for the Citizens with an analytic mind and critical thought.

We call a sign of future action positioning and acts which are basic enough and generalizable enough (that is, we can draw a rule of behavior a person will follow for all occasions sharing the same parameters) and for which acts no differentiating factor or uniqueness has been made. They are, therefore, the behavioral motifs that are continually repeated no matter what the person engaging in them claims in word.

Especially in the frame of entire states, a sign of future action is that which everyone looks out for to arrange their own course and the dealings they will have towards the state or the leader displaying it.

In the particular case of G. Papandreou, several signs of future action were given in his previous runs in basic administrative positions (as vital as the ministry of foreign affairs which he holds now, too) but we don’t even need those todemonstrate that the behavior and direction for which he had been voted down back then is the same he is swiftly following now, while he can and while communicationally (not actually) he falsely claims his government is Popular and is representing the Hellenic People (see the qualitative analysis and true interpretation of the election results).

In the current analysis we will demonstrate how in two speeches and one comment as well as with his presence and approval he indirectly but definitely announced to us what he is going to do not only in the issue of the Skopjan claim (the name as well as the lands and possession and historicity of Macedonia being Greek) but also in the Greek-Turkish issues, and not only the Cyprian aspect of them.

Before we mention how and where each step and each indirect announcement lies, we will show the common denominators with which one can locate such indirect announcements, not only in his speech in the inter-Balkan meeting but also in his statements regarding the signing of the agreement between Turkey and Armenia.


1. the case of Skopje is full of claims historicity and demand to rewrite History so that a usurping of the Hellenic character of Macedonia and a deletion of all the historic events mentioning heroic actions but also huge crimes of war against Humans at the expense of the Greeks living/staying/ coming from Macedonia, the Macedonians, will occur.

2. the case of Skopje also tries to substantiate a false and twisted legal ground using Human Rights to promote and legalise the breaching of the Human Rights of other populations and especially Hellenic ones.

3. the case of Skopje leans on the claim that in favour of material/ developmental and international ‘well being’ as well as stability, objectivity must be sacrificed in favour of blatant forging of all evidence, proof and uncontestable legal and Humanitarian/ Historical Rights of anyone with whom this formation borders and which is simply supported by the forces the governments of the USA represent.


1. Turkey is based on arbitrary breaches which become status quo in order to legalize essentially illegal claims on the grounds of shows of power supported by those who have always, historically, supported her (USA, UK, Germany and at times France and Russia) both as Ottoman Empire and later as the supervisor of her older fractured provinces and current typically independent states.

2. Turkey is based on false legal grounds that can be shot down, regarding Human Rights. She systematically denies the historicity of her own crimes against Humanity, such as the Armenian genocide, the Asia Minor Hellenes genocide, the Hellenes of the Pontos genocides, the genocide of those of Constantinople as well as other populations presenting a danger of weakening Turkey, presenting her as a mosaic of Peoples rather than a single unified People, just as the case is with Skopje and the USA. But the USA cover their weakness through a different propaganda through the ages.

3. Turkey is based on her casus belli threats to convince her adversaries to cooperate, as indirectly yet clearly via the distancing and avoidance to have these threats condemned by the UN, EU, NATO, etc, it is shown that Turkey will have war support by third powerful parties (fact which is not at all ensured if war was truly to take place, since much more is at stake and much more lucrative conditions throughout Europe would be threatened, as we will analyze in future articles), and thus an adversary of Turkey would have more to deal with than the quality of the Turkish army.

On closing we must mention that Skopje as well as Turkey fervently wish to acquire EU membership as then (and if such a membership is given without stipulations on population mobility) it will be very easy within a short amount of time to fragment Greece with excuses of the type of Cyprus, and these fragments will never again be reunited.


The current PM and Foreign Affairs minister has stated the following on how he stands regarding the Hellenic position in Europe and the Balkans:

1. from his speech on 2009/10/09 in the informal meeting: “we ought to continue to transform Europe and our fears, fears on the change of borders or minorities must be evaporated so that we will build relationships of respect in the frame of our differences.”

2. from his statements in the same speech on Skopje: “regarding our other neighbor in the North, Skopje, we share common interests, wanting to see our area prosper, be stable and safe.”

3. in the same speech on Turkey: “I believe in the prospect of [Turkey] becoming a full member and I will work to this end in the European Union.”

4. from his statements in Constantinople on the same day: “we ought to free Cyprus from dependencies on her mother land. We ought to free Cyprus from the occupation forces. We ought to free Cyprus from divisions and walls that have no place in the European Union.”

5. from his salutation in the agreement of Turkey-Armenia on 2009/10/11: “I welcome this historic agreement for the amelioration of relations between Turkey and Armenia and I hail the effort and political volition in which the two leaders invest in order to overcome differences and to work in favour of security and stability in the area which is to the interest of everyone.”

The above quotes should already have shown the alignment and devotion of G. Papandreou and the undermining he hopes to continue to perform in the countryjust like the former minister of Foreign Affairs D. Bakogiannis of the Karamanlis government, in the same speed and impudence, but we will analyze them one by one:

Regarding the salutation in the agreement between Turkey-Armenia, we must bear in mind that with this agreement, the Armenian Foreign Affairs minister Edward Nalbandian (whom the Armenians are called traitor and threaten with death) accepted to hush and allow for no recognition and any step towards rectification, apology and reimbursement the genocide of the Armenians and he UNILATERALLY ACCEPTED TO OPEN THE BORDERS OF ARMENIA WHEN TURKEY DID NOT DO THE SAME.

That is, G. Papandreou hailed a blatant breach of Human Rights and the global cover up of one of the most heinous war crimes against Humanity (while for much less generals and leaders have been very recently executed), in essence saying that he is willing to sacrifice the millions of victims, their families, their Rights on lands and fortunes stolen in favour of an uncertain prosperity that is not précised whose it will be (the big capital holders’ of the energy sources or the People’s) and for peace that at any time is threatened by the very same instigator of that genocide. After this huge treason by the Armenian Foreign Affairs minister, the criminals and murderers demanded further more profit land-wise to be extracted from their victims who accepted to swallow their annihilation.

When, therefore, the same happens not only with Cyprus which is already programmed as it seems from quotes on Cyprus we presented but also with the Aegean and Thrace, what is the sign of future action G. Papandreou has given on the policy he will follow? Not only will he sign whatever the Turkish representative asks him to, giving away whatever he is ordered to give away by the assorted USA representative (exactly like Hillary Clinton ordered the Armenian to sign immediately without any demand and he obeyed), he won’t even have the tight expression of his Armenian counterpart, but he will be smiling more widely than the Turk, unless of course he is fearing for his life like the Armenian is.

We should note that especially to the Armenians, the USA President Obama had promised a recognition of the genocide before he was elected, but after his election he sent his foreign affairs minister to order them to denounce their history and shame their dead and their ancestors on their own. G. Papandreou, who so openly pledges allegiance and loyalty to the USA, to the point that he refers to his office as ‘the oval office’, will fully obey the American foreign affairs minister as her employee, which explains his hurried move to be present and offer assurances on his position the true overseer of the USA in the Balkans, Turkey.

When the matching thing happens from Skopje with matching threats by them of ‘destabilization’ and even war as they have already begun to half-whisper, as well as threats for financial death (although the only one who can threaten Skopje with something like that is us), according to his above statements and according to how he saw to it that he applauds the degradation and shaming of Armenia (while others with more risks to take than Greece did not do that), he will accept to sign anything in the name of ‘peace and economic prosperity’ in essence giving away to Skopje any right demanded of him by the representative of USA, trampling on our National existence, historicity and dignity.

At this point we must mention that a movement for Greece in the international academic and scientific sector is gradually but very consistently and increasingly rising based on many scientific fields, staggeringly much evidence, technical essays and titled signatures (in the academic world whatever you sign directly reflects on your credibility as a scientist, therefore nobody signs anything they cannot be sure or of does not have the guarantee of political/ capital holder cover which does not seem to be occurring in this case), which has manifested in the form of an official letter to the USA president Obama (the Obama letter) for Greece and against Skopje. How can he, who seems to continually seek the aid of foreign scientists, does not seize the opportunity to use more than 300 top authorities on the exact issues of populations, history and historicity to demonstrate that Skopje should be named what they want except ‘Macedonia’ and other offshoots of that?

The question will be officially posted in this manner in an official inquiry to G. Papandreou, who is required by Law to answer. Unfortunately, it is certain to any thinking person that the answer is simply that G. Papandreou has promised loyalty and obedience to a different flag than the Greek one, to whom he has sworn, and that he obeys other taskmasters than those who pay him according to the Constitution, i.e. us: he obeys those (big capital holders and progeny of ancient power-wielding dynasties) who pay and oversee so that the USA government is the world government.

Everything in our analysis can be substantiated not only by G. Papandreou’s current action but also with his former one and that of his political party since its foundation. Also, all this is historically substantiated and for one more time it is shown that while Greece has many Rights nobody can deny her, she either loses them because she relies without assurances on the words of the assorted ‘ally’ (that all Foreign Affairs ministers urge us to bow to without dignity or reward) or because she relies on politicians like G. Papandreou and K. Karamanlis and their peers who historically have led us not only to financial but also National/ international disaster.
We as Citizens act against all anti-Hellenic strategies and with a current letter from the EU to us personally (which clearly simply seeks to gain time before having no choice but officially taking a stance on our questions) we were given access to communicate to the one ‘responsible’ to state the EU stance on the Skopjan matter as we phrase it in our declaration (see the initial post of this blog), an answer than may be sent within the famous 100 day period (as an EU representative will press for the inclusion of Skopje in the EU regardless of its name) tous or may not be sent at all before we legally demand it, as it will force the EU to stop keeping the ‘neutrality’ it illegally is falling back on now

Thursday, August 13, 2009

Humanitarian and Political Manifesto to the Hellenic People and the Nations

Within the frame of the stipulation by the Constitution of Greece in its current form, and in particular the stipulation that every Hellenic Citizen serve the Human Rights, the principles of Democracy and the Constitution itself, we hereby present the following political and Humanitarian Declaration-Deposition, being of sound mind and having according written proof for everything stated below, including all of the indications and statements of intent.


Since my beginnings as active Citizen of Greece in 1973, after the assassination of my father Georgios A. Geritsidis, my goal has been the defense of the State and our Nation within the guidelines and limits set by the Human Rights globally alone, as well as the upholding of Truth and Justice as pillars of any Democratic society.

My studies in the field of psychology and scientific research were chosen for this specific purpose, which I have been pursuing and will continue to pursue for ever, primarily to keep alive the mission and motive inspired in my by my father for the defense of all Humans at all costs and always with Truth, Peace and Objectivity as my weapons, and secondarily because I cannot imagine life and Human evolution in an environment where these values do not reign in daily living. I refuse to tolerate and become an accomplice through my silence and inactivity to the crimes against Humanity and the cultivation of misery and despair everywhere, on all levels so that Humans are pushed to subhuman, unnatural, wild behavior.

I began my cause to fight all these social conditions plaguing Humanity starting from Greece, that I consider home and therefore a valid starting point of any effort to cleanse and improve the setting. Always, I had and have faith in the good nature of Humans when Humans are allowed to act as units, independent of obligation to belong to a social group. But what I ascertained was that the need to belong to established social groups being exploited by specific agents of oppression and mutilation of personality as well as Human daily life, has sown the highest terror in society and has twisted fully the correct and benevolent nature of Humans.

History worldwide has many times shown that the process of oppression and rape of the benevolent nature, intelligence and personality of Humans on a mass level (i.e., on entire social units such as social classes, social groups across classes, age cohorts or states and nations) has always led to an explosion of throwing off of the diseased and enforced violation of nature and normal evolution of Humans individually and socially, with huge loss of human potential, horrible violence and callus, cruel eradication of entire masses, to reinstate a superficial sensation of re-institution of Justice and Freedom and restart the same vicious circle, until the next, bloodier, crueler and more callus, horrible explosion.

As a social scientist, in my studies I saw this tactic refresh itself with mathematical accuracy and the losses to increase with mathematical accuracy as well throughout the span of the so called ‘modernity’, with the pinnacle being the last few centuries and on the twentieth having the biggest and most massive movements followed by terribly large-scale in numbers losses for the again terribly short lived sensation of the reinstatement of Justice over injustice of society. The word is of the groundbreaking philosophical movements which after the fall/ corruption of the Church (regardless of denomination but mainly of the monotheistic Churches) were able to be expressed anew (since the religious expression was ridiculed or corrupted or twisted into the exact opposite from the main, positive positions) through science and ethics: the blooming of those, that is the essential effort to throw off the diseased and corrupting oppression was immediately eroded and stifled with the outbreak of violence and unfettered expression of every negative element, fact which led to the first great documented mass war surge (World War I), followed by the first great documented mass economic disaster (the Great Depression) and with a global climax in World War II, which, as was expected according to the historical data, by far surpassed the losses and blood-shedding of the first.

Afterwards there came the expected superficial reigning of Justice, more and more superficial since, after this immense butchering, the bloodshed continued unofficially and in fragmented assorted manners (the Allies’ going ahead with all the programmed executions and incarcerations the Nazis had scheduled, evacuation of the Nazi scientists and continuation of all their experiments, undermining of societies economically with several additional bloodsheds especially in countries by nature Democratic, allowing the defeated states of the Axis not pay war reparations in full or at all, or reparations for the extensive crimes of war, enforcement of silent dictatorships with mass persecution of the opposing people and, in our days, enforcement of silent dictatorships in the name of security or even Justice with the officially stated breaching of Human Rights, for which so much blood has been and is being shed).

Studying, then, and seeing all this blood which has been and is being shed, and all this potential which has been squandered and is being squandered, I felt from that very young age that the tree of Democracy and Justice and Human Rights has been watered with enough blood of the righteous and not. It is the time now to cultivate it with the symbols of Peace so that we will manage, finally, as Humanity to taste the fruit it can bear, or else more blood, more pain and more sacrifice will turn it into the altar of Injustice and Oligarchy, where everyone will be forced to throw their children and themselves.

It took all this time and all this fighting I have up to now done on several levels to realize how we can practically translate the above so that in the from of a formula we can apply it and not have the excuse that theory has no practical application.

As any true and responsible scientist, I shall not present neither theory nor practice without proof of its reality in the existing situation as well as the potential/ prognosis of the suggested treatment.

Proof of existing situation


In the presentation of the theory I will see to it to be concise and include the Greek as well as Global reality at least for the Western type/ social system societies.

Every country bases peace and harmony of daily living on a system of values on the basis on which the administrative and legal framework is created. In almost all the countries, officially this value system is the Human Rights. Even in the countries where they have not been signed, the value system remains human-centered, claiming the precedence of Humans at least regarding their safety.

Human Rights, since 1948 have been embellished and expanded (not always with the goal of improvement of protection) but we can safely say that all their expressions are based of the following vital and basic Rights:

Right to Life
Right to Freedom
Right to economic and social Dignity
All Humans enjoy Equal Rights and Obligations.

An easy and quick overview of the constitutions or other matching documents of the countries which haven’t signed the Bill, we will see that these four principles are mentioned clearly, except perhaps to a point in the countries accepting kingdom and titling (e.g. the Declaration of Independence of the USA contains these principles even though this state has not signed the Bill of Human Rights).

Consequently, so has the Hellenic Constitution been based fully on these principles if we exclude amendments of questionable legality that took place with arbitrary procedure and obvious malignant motives (see the Constitution amendments voted during the assorted Juntas and/ or without a Referendum or other insurance of People’s Will), in general the Constitution seeks to ensure that the basic power lies at the hands of the People and their capacity to overthrow anti-People laws, governments and other expressions of oppression.

Therefore, in brief:

Theory tells us that

The People have the Right in essence of above-law will and obligation to protect/ defend this Right.
Human Rights are world recognized and the official statement of motivation to protect them assigns status and potential of founding an entire state mechanism/ international organizations/ international coalitions.
Nobody acts without in some way projecting an intent to protect one or more of these Rights.

Historic examples (such as Nazi propaganda or the propaganda of any experimental activity on large scale populations) exist abundantly and all show that REGARDLESS OF MOTIVATION, ALWAYS EVERY ACTION/ APPLICATION OF MEASURES IS GIVEN JUSTIFICATION BY THOSE ENFORCING IT AS AN ATTEMPT TO DEFEND ONE OR MORE HUMAN RIGHTS.


Beyond any historical analysis we could present here, we will mention part of my research and activity as well.

Human Rights paint a very positive and very constructive image which, however, is by far different from the image society has to show (in Greece as well as globally) in reality.

Proof of that is very easy to present primarily with the listing of the innumerable people living below poverty level, the listing of the innumerable cases where the law was not applied Equally, or the cases where legislation enforces a state of inequality, enforced poverty to serve the over-profiting of the few or the cases where human dignity is consumed and violated for the profit of the few without application of the Law regarding prostitution/ pornography/ exploitation of minors/ slave work/ drudgery / usury/ etc. Also, when such laws are applied, they are applied unequally, unfairly or abusively, breaching on Human Rights in the name of Human Rights.

Also, on the individual basis (i.e., in the case of the law being applied singularly to every Citizen) we have complete inequality, lawlessness and breaking of basic Rights or Obligations to support third parties at the expense of the one concerned. The State is hostile and abuses the power given it to apply the laws, in disdain and dismissal of the People’s Will, be it expressed through demonstrations or through non-objective election legislation which in itself undermines the basic principle of Democracy (that is, the power of the majority and not the power of the majority of the minority).

Proof of this is easy to acquire from analyses of elections/ electorates, etc, from the state of the Citizens if we survey their financial situation in relation to their ‘networking’ with people who are holding down state official positions (that is, to have some be preferred not meritocratically but unequally and in a totalitarian way, which is a breach of Human Rights).

Also, proof is the legislative decisions of the judiciary officers who obviously break the law they are supposed to apply on the level of defending National property (giving away of massive national ground based on or respecting documentation by regimes that have been toppled or by occupiers or empires that have been dismantled, such as the case of relinquishing the forests of Attica to dynasty-clans of private owners such as the Iliopoulos family based on non-existent decrees by the Turks: the very same Turks the Greeks fought to oust and throw off, that is, in order to not have to take under consideration Turkish titles and rights of possession on Greek soil).

Another piece of proof from the innumerable ones existing out there is the capacity of some people’s existing within vital positions in society and especially state-public mechanisms while being convicted to incarceration they never serve nor buy out, and which incarceration sentence normally forbids them access to specific positions in the state mechanism, as the law stipulates.

The biggest proof of the fall-out of society and the official breaching of the Human Rights exists within the Constitution itself after its being altered during the junta, and the maintenance of these alterations afterwards in the period of ‘reinstatement’ of Democracy (metapolitefsi), exactly like the persecutions done by the Nazis were further executed by the ‘liberator’ leaders of the allies: I am alluding to the Greek law on ‘parliament/ minister member responsibilities’ which is essence is an official admission that the government sector is being overrun by thieves, conspirators and murderers who consciously ar such and therefore have seen to it that they place themselves abovethe law, i.e. that they breach the Right not only of the access to security of all Humans/Citizens- since they are rampant in plaguing Humans/ Citizens with impunity, but also that of Equality before the law.

A simple overview even of current events (despite the lack of objectivity and inclusion of everything taking place) will enrich frightfully the list of examples.

However, to counter arguments of the type that ‘basically the Citizen is protected in his/her personal affairs’ or ‘there is a way for a Citizen to be represented and find Justice/ protect his/her Rights, I personally have gathered an overabundance of proof to the contrary. This proof is official (i.e. official documents by the State, legal case files, depositions, claims by state agents / officials, statements/ actions of politicians up to live recordings) and made known to the individuals the names of whom exist in it.

In particular, I have proof that lawyers in their sum are not taught to apply the Law but to terrorize the Citizens that the Law is powerless to protect them before the omnipotence of a judge of questionable integrity and level of corruption presiding over a trial or giving a decree on an issue. I have proof of the against-the-law rallying of the judiciary officials, police officers and public sector employees inillegal activity, up to testimonials of the indoctrination of such public sector employees under training: they are being trained in not knowing the laws of their country on the one hand, and not hesitating to break any law to cover the illegality- crime of a colleague or superior on the other hand.

I also have proof of overt disdain to/ breaching of the Constitution including intent to act as such by all without exception the ministers regardless of which administration/ government we talk about, but especially the latest ones in office.

Everything can be procured immediately with filing numbers, serving numbers and other documentation to whoever is interested or does not also possess similar proof from his/her daily life within our State or within any other (which is impossible if the person seeks to not be a part of the aforementioned groups-gangs even at a little level, and is above 15 years of age).

We therefore conclude, comparing the theory of existing/ founding and projected respect for Human Rights with the application/ action of these values globally, that in essence these values were never applied, not because something like that is impossible or utopian but simply because the People who shed their blood for them were to a great extent eradicated and the rest cheated by this global-level gang of infringers.

Clearly and scientifically we can successfully support with the above proof that


Anyone truly seeking the application of Human Rights for his/her own self primarily but also the others, is obligated to distance him/herself from the above practices and independently and singularly act to defend them.

Suggested treatment (i.e. the manner to deal with and abolish the diseased condition)


History has proven that the typical reaction (i.e., the violent attack against the individuals governing, with various resolutions from killing to exile) does not yield results and to a very big extent trivializes or corrodes the effect of the People’s Will, via the replacement of the former criminals with new ones or, in cases of superficial peace like the one we are experiencing now, the succession of specific groups in the positions of power without any real change to the better and over many changes for the worst for the People and the individual.

The process of elections and being elected is now fully corroded and burdened with several safety valves in place so that no person unwilling to cultivate and protect the silent dictatorship I described can enter. Therefore, neither that can safely be used since with proven mechanisms (a simple overview of the election laws as well as the requirements for candidates-parties will prove it) it is impossible to ensure a real representation of the People’s Will. In any case that is obvious when conducting referendums is severely avoided, even within these regimes of rigging we are having now, at least within the Hellenic People.

If, therefore, neither guns nor the vote is a decisive control point anymore, the only thing left which has not been corroded is the set of laws and the Constitution:

the Constitution, even in the adulterated form it now has, legalizes each Citizen to ignore and react, handling anyone as enemies of the People and the Regime who dares breach it or the Human Rights.
the Constitution does not require interpretation of the basic amendments since it relies upon every Citizen to protect it incase it is being compromised by outward as well as inward threats.
the Constitution in essence contains the Human Rights but beyond that, for all the countries that have signed the bill they have above-law and above-constitution validity/ power. Therefore, HUMAN RIGHTS ARE THE HIGHEST AND MOST SACRED LAW, THE ONLY ONE ABOVE THE CONSTITUTION.


Application – Procedure

The above has been applied by me and I am applying it to prove the force existing in the application of the above theory which aims at reinstating the Democracy without it being superficially applied and without, if possible, bloodshed. In essence it is the only way to break the vicious circle maintaining these dynasties that globally have been living parasitically and have been twisting-oppressing-committing crimes to keep the positions that truly belong to Democratic, Human-centered and Positive individuals.

With the completion of my research through the judiciary corps, I followed the above theory through the following steps:

Good knowledge of the Constitution
Good knowledge of basic criminal and civil law codes (not by heart)
systematic documentation of my course to defend my interests/ Rights with continuous filing of letters or reports, so that each attempt to break the law in my expense is officially documented.
determination and tenacity and persistence.

That which I ascertained as a single Citizen, without the accompaniment of a supporting mob, without the title of an official/ politician but just with the title of Citizen is the following:

no public servant, judiciary official/officer, politician or official dares write down that they are breaching the Constitution or Human Rights WHILE THEY WILL ATTEST TO THAT ORALLY/ VERBALLY.
all the above mentioned in 1 will misinterpret or simply erroneously/ in fragments mention laws, regulations, decrees, legislation or the Constitution itself to refuse to do that which their position demands of them, and for which they are being overabundantly paid.
all those mentioned in 1 will cling with the broken record tactic to already shot-down arguments hoping the Citizen will lose heart or be scared or have no more time to give to the issue or will not exist any longer for any reason. BUT IF THE CITIZEN PERSISTS REGARDLESS THEY WILL SUBSIDE AS LITTLE AS POSSIBLE, MAINLY BY FREEZING THE CASE OR SATISFYING IT ONLY PARTIALLY.
all the above mentioned act exactly like gangs, in coordination and in accordance. Only when there is no further margin of supporting each other does this camaraderie break.
all the above mentioned disappear or are assigned another post when this camaraderie is about to break.
all are based on gaining time as the only actual weapon of defense they have against the Citizen who is rightfully seeking vindication.

Following the procedure with as persistence and patience it took in each case my Rights were breached (to the point I can record and prove it with evidence and testimonies) I managed to stave off personal disasters on the financial level (by the IRS and other agencies) as well as more generalized disasters on the professional and social level when due to my activity as a scientist-educator I was systematically undermined with the complicity of other citizens, public services and judiciary corps.

At this moment, without fear and with the interests of Greece in mind (that is, the interest of every Hellenic Citizen as myself, individually and in group) I take a series of steps aimed at the reinstatement of true Democracy at least as it is described in the Constitution, in its basic Amendments regarding the Human Rights and its final concluding amendments (NOT in the amendments incorporated by governments either completely anti-People or obviously non Democratic-treacherous).

In particular, to each ministry there has been sent via the President of the Parliament a specific declaration pointing out in the form of general patterned behaviour the way the Constitution and the Human Rights are being breached per jurisdiction, with the demand for a meaningful response and positioning as the Law demands.

In the second phase, each ministry is sent an official inquiry/ complaint/ report (depending on what the Law allows me to do under my function as Citizen, and it is a lot) containing specific law-breachings and infringements of the Constitution/ Human Rights, again with specific demands.

The third phase that is going to be pursued is persecution by me against anyone who, via their reaction/response to these letters, officially display their illegality.

The fourth phase after the blatant fall-out of Justice which I am expecting is going to happen, at least in some if not all sectors, is the denouncements of these peoples as dictators/ overthrowers of the Democratic Regime, making it totalitarian, worldwide (Greece has committed to not having an official totalitarian regime).

The fifth phase is about having the people take a stance en masse, since as a truly liberal and democratic person, what I am interested in is that the People and any People live what they truly want, even if that is to be a servant to anyone deciding to oppress them, BUT WHEN THEY HAVE TRULY UNDERSTOOD AND EXPERIENCED WHAT IT MEANS TO TRULY BE THE POWERFUL PEOPLE IN THEIR NATIONAL GROUND ALONE, FREE OF DEMAGOGUES AND MANIPULATION TACTICS FOR THE MASSES.


At this time I am at the second and third phases, and I have already survived attacks by the State in the professional, financial and social areas, with continuous and definitely brazen, blatant attempts to violently take me away from public life, indirectly through illegal financial charges, exhausting taxation, professional illegal undermining and false accusations which illegally are not dropped based on the overabundance of hard evidence (the trials never take place, or are delayed or are issued incomplete trial transcripts, the ministers change, district attorneys break the law and try to cover for each other when I accuse them, etc).

The reason I am now publicizing my action and my intentions is because I don’t want to have the same end as my murdered by the exact same state/regime father, whose true cause of death was hidden by state reports until today and was presented as collateral damage instead of an intended victim killed willfully and maliciously.

I wish to make it known, in case my name or that of my daughter’s and co-fighting Citizen Tanya Maria Geritsidou, is ever found in a list of collateral damage, accidents, ‘random’ violence/ crimes of the simple criminal code, illness (we are fully healthy), that our action is impossible to fail, at least in offering to those who want it, the free will to choose what life they want to lead, without having to shed their blood for it.

If something like that happens, it will simply denote the scope of despair of those exploiting Humanity and Greece in particular, and the scope of the success of two individual Citizens without any other support nor seeking of such support, against all those summoning armies and mobs to sow terror.

Our Cause is especially designed not to have followers nor leader, but to stem from truly Free Individuals, as is the quality of the real Hellenic and any other Free Nation.

Our Cause does not need a leader nor a specific group/ rallying or organization. It only needs Free, Adult Individuals not seeking leaders but leading their own lives, able to evaluate and make choices without following, but instead with walking alongside. Each fight by the Greeks fought that way was successful, and only failed when it was saddled with just one leader instead of having every Greek be one.

Anyone who attempts to use any part of this ideology of ours, of our work and our fight to become a leader for anyone else, will be a usurper like Napoleon was of the French Revolution and the Papandreou family of the life and murder of Gregory Lambrakis.

In full knowledge and conscience of the above, in Athens, August 6 2009

Olga Georgiou Yeritsidou

Tanya Maria Geritsidou

Saturday, August 23, 2008

The Use of the Macedonian Matter as a Trojan Horse

In all the mass communication, from the mass media to the internet, the following diplomatic communication trajectories are visible:

1. that there is some basis ( of positive prescription, historical, oppressed, historic-political-social) in the entirety of the general mythology and propaganda around the state of FYROM

2. that anything the representative of this state says or does with regards to his ‘steadfasteness’, whether it is logical or not, holds far more eight than anything the Greek side says or does.

3. that the Greek People and their culture will be proven ‘nationalistic’ which apparently means by default that they are totalitarian, fascist, backward and against humanitarianism if they do not in essence satisfy what they are being bullied into satisfying.

4. that no consequence at all nor danger is linked to the satisfaction of the claims which at this time have the state of FYROM as frontispiece.

We have many times demonstrated in this blog the falsehood of all four of the above propaganda trajectories, and we have additionally shown what this satisfaction of claims will mean not only for the Greeks but also for the entire Balkan peninsula and later, with escalation, for the rest of the world. At this time Greece is the stalling factor to a series of actions primarily in the Balkan area but later world-wide for the following reasons:

At this time:

1. Greece is a symbol of the schema of ‘Nation’ as a group that is entitled to a historically justified land area, uniform population, uniform language, specific and archaeologically and anthropologically substantiated history, specific culture and a full right to defend these properties.

2. Greece is a symbol of the historicity and the civilization that throughout the ages not only has remained living but also is the base of several later cultural miracles such as the Enlightenment, the Renaissance in Europe, the foundation of Scientific Thought which will be undermined to the fullest if Greece, which gave rise to their roots is discredited as a totalitarian or fascist schema, exactly as the power of the explosion of German Philosophy and Culture development was lost with the advent and imposition on this Nation of Nazism which in reality does not represent any Nation at all.

3. Greece is a symbol of the standing up and victory of the few, but purely and straightforwardly acting on the base of reason, truth and justice against the many outnumbering opponents/ enemies, throughout history. From the opposition of the Greeks against the Persian Empire from 492 to 479 BC up to the 20th century AD the Greeks behaved in the same manner, as it has also officially been globally recognized, not only in the Second World War (“heroes fight like Greeks’ as Winston Churchill said) but in their resistance to the truly totalitarian and fascist regimes such as the Junta of 1967 and the peaceful purists of the students which also marked the beginning of its end with the Polytechnic and the Law School in 1973. The false and seeming existence of the state of FYROM as small, hunted and wronged by Greece undermines unfairly and deceptively a symbol and a Nation which never hunted the underdog or the oppressed.

As this symbol we just described, Greece is incompatible as a concept but also as a schema with the general pressure of Globalization in the Balkans which requires the following political situation: It is necessary to abolish the concept of the Nation and State and the resulting obligation of the Citizen to protect his Nation and State. This right/ obligation in its own turn constitutes guarantee of the National and State protection of the Citizen, not only from other threatening States, but mainly it guarantees National and State protection from anti-humanitarian economic policies, from corporate imperialism/ colonization, from economic and cultural depression and oppression of the uniqueness of the People (to the point of abject racism) and finally from the serf-making of the Citizens/ Humans and their being forced to belong to the few holders of international corporations, banking institutions and capital. This therefore constitutes protection exactly from the social situation as it was during the middle ages (with the holders being the land owning aristocrats), before the enforcement of the schema of the modern State of Welfare by the People.

And how is the Skopjan matter the frontispiece of Globalization and a Trojan Horse against (but not limited to) the People of the Balkans?

This is the case because the whole matter has been designed not by the representatives of FYROM but by those protecting and promoting them, that is the diachronic USA administration (and not of the People of the USA) which is directed, funded, controlled and serving the stateless capital owners/ holders, creators and upholders of the new economic aristocracy. This new aristocracy comes from the old class of the large landowning aristocrats who were ousted in the post 1900 era where the concept of the master land owner was not yet tolerable, and who are now founding the dominance of their imperium (regarding their land limits which were rightfully taken away from them by the People) anew through the international / multinational corporate companies which obscured the names of their owners because these names were and are symbols of all those who were ousted and rejected by People everywhere.

Globalization sets these international corporate companies above Constitutions and the People’s laws and in essence above the Human Rights and every other Humanistic Declaration which had forbidden these individuals, who have the genealogy we just mentioned, allowing them to exploit Humanity with conditions either medieval or of the first stage of the Industrial Revolution, when people worked 18 hours per day, seven days a week until they died (often on the workplace) with literally meager daily wages, since it was impossible to sustain oneself and one’s family, the members of which worked under the same conditions.

Globalization, therefore, abolishes the concept of the state as an organization which protects the People and the Citizen, forbidding entrepreneurs of all kinds to use human potential under these conditions, offering health care, life with pension, property and financial independence and security (i.e. the ensuring of necessary according to Human Rights means for acceptable living and the non-need of loans and other financial dependencies from banking ‘institutions’ of this new aristocracy and thus being owned by it), the capacity to have pride in and develop the National and cultural identity, which is also a necessary element not only for the evolution of every People but also the whole of Humanity through pluralism, which disappears with the fusing of a vague uniform mixed culture with which no People or Nation can identify and therefore develop.

Globalization also promotes one and only value and aim for Humans, abolishing all the rest: materialism and the serving of money/ capital which belongs ‘by right’ to the few all-holding corporate businessmen who are presented as qualitatively (genetically/ mentally/ by birthright) superior to the rest of the Humans upon the earth, who work for the promotion and development of ‘the company’ of which they are part and product/ resource (Human Resources) and therefore are objectified (i.e. humans are reduced to the role of a product/ commodity), thus leaving as sole representatives of Humanity (and therefore beneficiaries of the vested rights of People and their Declarations) only the masters of these corporations/ companies. In order for that to happen it is necessary to a vital level to erase the history of the last 200 years globally. Some Nations, such as Greece, with its millenia-deep history, no matter how summarily it is presented, offers ideas and symbols of the Equality of Humans, Freedom and Prosperity- ideas which cannot allow the application of globalization and the ‘widening of the social class gap’ which we just described.

No matter how much people are not aware of history around the earth, they do know from the field of history particular historical symbols which represent liberal concepts from which States of Welfare and Constitutions/ Declarations arose. Even in their worn out application of the past decades, these Constitutions and Declarations teach the People that they are born Human with inalienable rights and not born animals in a livestock pen. It is therefore necessary for the installation of globalization to erode and take down these symbols of History, to twist them and mix them with other elements so that, just like the cultures disappear under one imposed multi-mixed unified hybrid culture to which nobody belongs, so will the histories of all the nations with all their wondrous achievements against this little numbered class disappear under the stories of kings, conquerors and tycoons of capital wealth where the People shall be a non-existent, dispensable, amorphous mass without importance or value.

Why is the Skopjan matter serving the above design?

Because it attacks a People-symbol which existed and exists throughout the ages from the beginning of Human History and which ever since was and is a source of inspiration and power and faith in Human Greatness not of the few but of everyone with the Individual uniqueness as the epitome regarding the potential to affect prosperity and evolution of whole groups.

Always, Greece and Hellenism symbolized the progress of Civilization either in its entirety as a People or in the face of representatives when enemy forces attempted to oppress/ conquer/ gag it. That is exactly what was the case in the periods of occupation of Greece and Hellenism by Romans, Byzantines (i.e. Romans of the eastern part of the Roman empire), Ottomans, Francs, Bulgarians, Nazis as well as various forms of unofficial/ covert colonization by the administrations of England and the USA, where the Greek element remained intact linguistically and anthropologically and was only embellished by the different additions which were absorbed into the Greek element and not vice versa.

Also Greece and Hellenism are the symbol of Freedom, Equality, Brotherhood, Justice, Cultivation, Open Mind and Free Spirit and great protection and promotion of Truth and Righteousness.

The Skopjan propaganda aims to sully and tear down this symbol we just described with the scientific-like presentation of its claims which portray Greece as completely opposite of what Greece symbolizes, namely as embezzling, suppressor, racist, unfair and lying. That is to say the Skopjan propaganda tries to prove with a forging of the elements and with some references from reports from writings, quoting them out of context as well as with claims that are not supported by hard evidence or correct analysis and the only status of which is that someone has published them.

They claim the existence of a Slavic language since the ancient times, concealing the fact that Slavs appeared as various races around 6th century AD and it is therefore historically impossible for their language to exist before them. They also claim that because ancient historians mention that the Macedonian dialect was not comprehensible in other Greek areas, it is proof that Macedonia and its People are not part of the Hellenic whole. This can be disproven by the study of all the ancient Greek dialects linguistically: They have the same exact roots and phonemes as the Macedonian dialect, and there is also the recording of the fact that the users of one Greek dialects (e.g. the Attic) could not comprehend easily or at all the users of another Greek dialect (e.g. the Dorian).

Another claim of their propaganda is that the kingdom of Alexander the Great and his father Phillip were not Greek since the Athenians of the era were resisting his advance. This can be disproven with a simple study of the sociopolitical situation of the City-State which justifies the assorted ancient wars between the Greeks of different areas without this meaning that they weren’t parts of the Hellenic whole (e.g. the wars between Athens and Sparta before and during that era, as well as occasional analogous strife with other Greece city-states such as Thebes, Corinth, etc). The process to which the Skopjans refer to and which Phillip began and Alexander continued before his campaign to Asia is a process of uniting all the Greek City-states into one Greek State and it is analogous to the much-acclaimed processes of unification of a Nation into a State that Charlemagne achieved for France/Gaul and that other monarchs did for England, Russia and other States. Phillip and his son simply managed to be among the first to successfully apply this tactic. Therefore using their activities to prove their non-Greek status is unfounded, deceptive and non-historical, exactly as the applying of globalization demands.

They also mention the use of the term Macedonia by Greeks as proof that the identity of these Humans is not Greek. This is a twisting of reality as they neglect to mention that the use of area names as a characteristic of descent by Greeks instead of the general term ‘Greek’ was not just an element of the ancient times but was their usual name of use up until during the 19th century to which the Skopjan propaganda makers refer to continually: In particular, during all of the Turkish occupation in Greece and during the War of Independence of 1821 the Greeks used area names and rarely the characterization ‘Greek’, primarily because there was terrorism by the Turks not to use the latter (the Turks enforced the name Romios on the Greeks for psychological violence and undermining since the appellation comes from the Turkish root ‘rom’ which means ‘scoundrel’) and later because it was a way to recognize instantly the basic skills of the rebelling fighters as soldiers (Souliotes (from Souli)= toughened land fighter, Hydraeans (from Hydra) = navy, Psarianoi (from Psara)= fire raft/ ship fighters, and others). Even today area names of descent are used to attribute basic population characteristics of Greek groups (Maniatis (from Mani)= does not forgive an insult, Macedonian (from Macedonia)= giving and gourmand, Peloponnesian (from the Peloponnesus) = makes a lot of savings, etc).

This type of twisting of reality by the Skopjan propaganda has a basis and is fully instigated by the Bulgarian interests in the area which they historically covet since the Byzantine times and have been seeking to conquer Northern Greece which at the time was part of the Byzantine empire against which the Bulgarian races invaded with this aim alone. Against them, the Greek Basil the Second the Macedonian fought their tsar Samuel and beat him so drastically that Samuel died of a heart attack upon looking on the evidence of his shambles and Basil the Second the Macedonian was called Bulgar-slayer.

The Bulgarians are lending themselves to serving the interests of globalization because in their modern history they have repeatedly tried to change history and the properties of the Greek People they want to conquer, projecting their own messages, cruel violence/ genocide to the Greek people when historically it can be proven that it is they who have tried to enforced their own Slavic language on the Macedonians who by nature are of a Hellenic dialect since antiquity.

During the Second World War (which with A. Hitler as a forefront was the first overt effort to enforce globalization, a 19th century idea, via military violence and race superiority) in cooperation with the Nazi Axis the Bulgarians tried during their occupation of Macedonia to bulgarize and enforce their Slavic language and Cyrillic script through raw violence and under pain of death, especially to young children/ adolescents, attempting a new form of janizary creation. It is also historically recorded that while withdrawing with their Nazi partners they took with them many Greek minors whom they raised to hate Greece, twisting history to serve their aims.

After the Second World War, when the military enforcement of globalization failed and Liberalism flourished in Europe once more despite the mass murder of Liberal Citizens everywhere, there was created around a decade later a more studied second attempt of economic enforcement of globalization which is now at its pinnacle and which began with the so-called Marshall Plan (ERP) by the USA which ever since are the basic vehicle of the new aristocracy we have already described for the establishment of Globalization (the New Order). When we refer to the USA we do not of course refer to the American People who were the first to be beaten to the ground by the principles of Globalization and who is suffering right now under its effect, but to the diachronic administration which enforced it and is defending it, embezzling the ideas of Freedom and Bravery (the land of the Free, the home of the Brave) so that the administration will cheat the People it is oppressing.

The USA administration (which serves the new aristocracy) supports everyone it can use so that it will blow out of the water all the symbols that have ever been used by the People and/or the People are inspired by while in the same time tear to pieces these countries which have them so that there will not even be physical evidence of the historical truth they are trying to conceal.

That is why, therefore, whatever the administration of Skopje reiterates is considered written in stone, that is why the Greek governments are permissive and treacherous and that is why the USA declare they will support the side that is lying (as, in any case, they have done in all the cases where with the help of traitorous governments they have smashed countries to fragments).
The Skopjan matter is a Trojan Horse for all the countries which have a history and/ or a history of political interest in the modern era, because with the arrival of the enforced migration and the refugees (again within the trajectories of Globalization) and the twisting of history which is broadcasted and cultivated by the mass media and in television series and movies, they will suffer the same tearing down and blatant distortion of their identity on the basis of the precedent which will have been created with the satisfaction of the state of FYROM and the new aristocracy which is using it through the new aristocracy’s representation by the USA administration.

Wednesday, July 23, 2008

Promotional Messages (2)


To conclude our analysis regarding the most recent publicized promotional trick which follows the letter exchange between the prime ministers of Greece and the country of Skopje, we will begin by saying which was the usefulness of the whole matter of Militi, Florina as well as by mentioning the importance of other moves which, while very important, are hidden by the Greek people and most possibly from the people of the country of Skopje while what is communicated internationally remains undefined.

In particular, from the so called ‘diplomatically dangerous’ issue of the celebration of the prophet Elijah in Meliti, Florina during which an annual Balkan culture festival takes place:

The mass media reported and commented:

1. that in Meliti there is an issue of ‘Macedonian’ minority and fortunes which is proven by the presence of dance and music groups from the country of Skopje, which play Slavic music, after their being invited by the organizers of the festival.

2. that people from the country of Skopje are invited and who are related to dwellers in Meliti, fact which is presented as further indication of the existence of this minority.

3. that nameless people (they are presented on television without name and function and of course no way to double check the evidence) mention their certainty for the existence of this minority in Meliti and Greece in general, self-naming themselves ‘Macedonians of the Aegean’.

4. that during the weekend, members of the far right that is identified with Nazism demonstrated at Greek borders against having buses carrying Skopjan demonstrators/ groups/ of diaspora enter, fact which according to them makes Greece look bad. After the intervention of the district attorney the ‘fanatics’ dispersed peacefully, and the access of the Skopjan people was allowed from that moment on.

5. that the Skopjans were very displeased because they were forced to wait for two hours in the borders while the security check was taking place for the security of the Greeks and peace, since Skopjans had publicly threatened with episodes on Greek soil, fact which for some reason is a minus for Greece.

Taking one point at a time we will explain a. what the mass media are attempting to get across to the Greek people, and b. why the whole issue of Meliti is fabricated for promotional reasons.

1. that in Meliti there is an issue of ‘Macedonian’ minority and fortunes which is proven by the presence of dance and music groups from the country of Skopje, which play Slavic music, after their being invited by the organizers of the festival.”

It is widely known that when one organizes a cultural festival where international cultural groups are participating one must primarily invite them actively so that they will schedule their appearance in the festival and one often offers financial remuneration / accommodation. From the moment the particular group accepts to appear exactly because it is cultural and represents the folklore of its culture/ Nation, it goes without saying that when it comes where the festival is taking place, the group will dance, sing and speak the language, the songs and the dances for which it was invited in the first place.

The existence of such a group which is visiting does not, of course, mean that there exist land or fortune-related or any other type of National matters of the group’s Nation of origin with the country the group is visiting, because if that was the case, then the whole globe would have issues in the several different countries because there have been observed in numerous of them appearances of Irish, Chinese, Aborigine, Shaolin, Argentinian, Spanish, Russian and other groups which blatantly and overtly dance their folk dances and speak their language throughout their stay in each country where the performances are taking place. That is to say, that something which is normal procedure is presented in a distorted manner by the mass media with the purpose of causing fear, anger and specific impressions.

“2. that people from the country of Skopje are invited and who are related to dwellers in Meliti, fact which is presented as further indication of the existence of this minority.”

Again there is an effort to intimidate through misinformation and a false attribution of graveness/ danger/ evidence-giving of a fact which is a world wide phenomenon because of the diverse movement of populations around the globe:

It is very logical to have it occur repeatedly in every country to invite relatives of different Nationalities and national status to visit their families in another country regardless if these families staying in the country are indigenous, immigrants, refugees, of the diaspora, etc. However this phenomenon does not constitute proof of land/ National/ fortune claim in the country they are visiting or they are staying as immigrants/ fugitives. If that were true, then the parade of the Greeks every 25th of March in Astoria, New York in the USA or the festivities of the Irish wordwide at St. Patrick’s Day with parades and the like would constitute evidence that Astoria is Greek soil under the occupation of the Americans for far more than 50 years, and the Irish soil is far larger than is apparent, with most of the irish lands being under occupation by more than six countries of the American Continent, Europe and Australia. All this without mentioning the other festivities openly celebrated and displayed by Chinese, Italian and other National groups.

“3. that nameless people (they are presented on television without name and function and of course no way to double check the evidence) mention their certainty for the existence of this minority in Meliti and Greece in general, self-naming themselves ‘Macedonians of the Aegean’”

Primarily the term ‘Macedonian of the Aegean” is a geographical oxymoron which, though it could simply be proof of the ridiculousness and arbitrariness of the people designing this propaganda, in essence it is an indirect but very definite attempt to transform a term which is connected to a specific area of Greece and its citizens (i.e. a subgroup term) into a term that is connected to a group and has, in turn, subgroups exactly like, for example, Greece is a term containing the subgroups Crete, the Cyclades, Epirus, Thrace, etc.

The people who present themselves to claim the above do not give any other proof beyond their word about their own existence, nor is it, of course, demanded by the mass media which are providing full coverage. After a phone research I conducted in the indigenous people of Meliti, I was informed that a very small group of individuals who are displeased or in a difficult position by the ruling party are stating all of the above for a fee. I was also informed that even under these circumstances it is very hard for the mass media / channels to find people who will make, even anonymously, these statements and ‘they hunt them down to find them like wolves’ as it was told me verbatim.

When I asked a person of the non-state radio of the area there why he had not mentioned all these things, he replied to me that the National Council for the Radio has forbidden to all the local stations except the state one to comment or report anything that does not strictly fall in the artistic/ sports categories.

4. that during the weekend, members of the far right that is identified with Nazism demonstrated at Greek borders against having buses carrying Skopjan demonstrators/ groups/ of diaspora enter, fact which according to them makes Greece look bad. After the intervention of the district attorney the ‘fanatics’ dispersed peacefully, and the access of the Skopjan people was allowed from that moment on

Primarily, this would not have occurred at all if through the Greek0wide and internationally broadcasting mass media it was not cultivated throughout the week a terrorism that the festival taking place in Meliti was going to have every other kind of significance except the objective, harmless and cultural profile it does have.

Secondarily, the constitutional right of every Greek citizen, regardless their political affiliation, to demonstrate peacefully his/her will is attacked. If and since the demonstration of these people consisted only from a vociferation of mottos and slogans nobody had the right to tell them to disperse.

Tertiarily, the particular group of people with their actions characterizes and intimidates the rest of the liberal Greeks into remaining idle (not regarding demonstrating, but regarding following ways that truly count and which the particular group of far right people certainly has not followed) and not defend their Human Rights for fear of not being characterized totalitarian, junta-lovers or fascists.

It is questionable why publicity was given to the particular group and its activities and the rest of the very wide activity of the Greeks within and beyond the borders, which is peaceful and liberal and teaches the proper way to defend the Human Rights of the Greeks (part of whom are the Macedonians) remains unpublished and non-broadcasted despite the successive press releases to all the previously mentioned channels which are the agents of political, social, moral, anti-religious and anti-national propaganda.

It is also unacceptable to have Greek population dispraised for the choice not to want certain elements to come in their country, fact which is their inalienable right just as it is for every population of every country. It is a right that seems to be upheld in the cases of closing up the borders for protection from terrorism that take place at the borders of the USA and the United Kingdom.

“5. that the Skopjans were very displeased because they were forced to wait for two hours in the borders while the security check was taking place for the security of the Greeks and peace, since Skopjans had publicly threatened with episodes on Greek soil, fact which for some reason is a minus for Greece.”

How someone feels, when this someone wants to enter a foreign country which seeks to defend peace and order within its borders and for that follows certain security measures that are typical and do not violate any human right, is irrelevant and does not make any sort of political argument or piece of news. The broadcasting of people who nag in front of the camera because they were obliged to prove, just like any alien, that they are not going to be part of criminal activity within Greek borders is just a means to unfairly anger a people.

If how a person subjected to security check at the borders of a country feels and what he/she has to say has gravity, then all the highly humiliating and insulting checks tourists have to go through in the borders of the UK and the US, as well as in every airport where personal affects are confiscated such as perfume and nail clippers, while others are viewed fully by third parties which constitutes a breach of personality and dignity of every person.

We see that with this analysis, the whole issue of Meliti is just a news-hunting and provocative, distorted presentation of a simple cultural celebration, fact which renders all the contributors to these news stories (reporters, commentators, producers, editors in chief, channel/station directors and owners, and others) as well as the state agents who allowed it to broadcast during the entire week warmongers, anti-peace, anti-hellenic and underminers of the well being and peace of the People of more than the state of Skopje.

Due to length we will refer to the issue of hiding or undertoning of very important elements with relation to the entire issue of Skopje next time.

Saturday, July 19, 2008

Promotional Messages

When a known Roman emperor said ‘The emperor’s wife should not only be honest, but also look honest’ that which he actually meant was that the importance of the presentation of issues is just as important with the essence of these issues. That is, a big percentage of the events and reactions taking place in global current events do not stem from the essence of things but from how ‘righteous-like’ the situation is allowed to be shown.

That is to say?

That is to say, somebody has the capacity to acquire the so-called ‘window of opportunity’ to go on to take some action, regardless if later it is proven that this somebody’s allegations were unfounded and abusive and he/she destroyed fortunes, lives and esteems unfairly with his/her actions.

This window of opportunity is created by a network of promotional messages which are threadbare but flashy, broadcasted by specific sources which protect these messages from counter-argument messages that would shoot them down immediately and show them to be ridiculous. So, actions take place which afterwards, like dominoes lead to other actions until a result is achieved which otherwise would be impossible to reach.

So history is constructed and things that should never have happened, given common opinion at the time before the spreading of specific promotional messages. Later history analysts just mention in brief how the people was ‘fooled’, ‘waylaid’, ‘enraged’, ‘maddened’ etc.

That which they do not analyze is why the people fell into those mindsets all of a sudden when just before they were calm or methodically progressing towards a specific trajectory (or improvement or deterioration depending on the era) based on the facts they were dealing with on a daily basis. Historic examples include the propaganda of Hitler, of the Ku Klux Klan, or the USA constitution regarding its coloured inhabitants towards the end of the 19th and during the 20th century, as well as during the beginning of the Greek civil war in 1947.

In all these occasions, wrong messages terrorized the People regarding certain groups within it and turned one against the other or towards war with other nations. These wars were completely imposed and the only thing they achieved was to eradicate a large percentage of the human potential of the People which in reality crippled the People ideologically, socially and financially.

In the case of the Skopjan issue now, we have an identical process of twisting and intimidation which leads to the same situations we just described. This process is the result of two cooperating group of forced which have nothing to do with the objective situation of the People of either side and their wishes.

What do we mean by that?

We mean that in the propaganda taking place we have once side which is ranting and raving that it is being wronged and oppressed and the other side, which remains silent or answers in a manner which leaves room for doubt. This, in Physics, is called a ‘force system’ which means that two forces cooperate to turn a lever, or move something heavy (the muscles of the body use the rules of the force system to move the members: one muscle pulls while the other relaxes).

With this system of forces the People is moved, from their default wish for peace and calm, to be fanatized and become violent, wishing for war. This has happened historically countless times with the most obvious example being that of the Second World War, where, from the ‘never again’ motto they had said in the end of WWI they were led and in essence forced to take part in an even worse bloodshed: The German People with the promotional messages of Hitler’s staff, which were very carefully designed (starting from liberal and proper ideas and very gradually evolving into nazist ideas of totalitarianism and genocide, a process which took two decades to mature and in which high profile people from the fields of philosophy, science, the arts and not just from Hitler’s staff contributed actively), and the rest of the Peoples with an inertness and denial (due to the assuaging and other distracting events which were designed to take Peoples’ attention away from the danger which grew and lurked) to realize during these two decades that the ideology dominant in Germany of the time (with the protests, the cultural events, the declarations and the demarches) was leading with mathematical accuracy to a war eruption.

Are you saying there was a cooperation of the leaderships of the states of that time towards the instigation of WWII?

For certain there was a force system which pushed the People to it, very consciously as it can be surmised and proven scientifically, technocratically and objectively from many things, one of which is the free and fully coordinated exchange and co-production of news reports and documentaries which misinformed or fanatized both sides, as well as the financial support of Germany by countries of the Allied front, so that Germany would continue having equipment and armed forced during the preparation and conducting of the WWII at least until its first half.

All this can be proven and are documented in international bibliography (e.g. the special technology developed by IBM for the filing and processing of the data of each one individual of the countless Jews, Gypsies and ideologically opposing people so that their eradication in the gas chambers could take place in full organization and controlled knowledge of even the history of each person that was chosen by computer to be put to death, have fortune taken, etc. The same goes for other technologies that made Hitler’s purging would be much more effective than they could have been if forces from the Allies’ side did not equip him and leave the money flow free towards him.)

And how does the Skopjan issue coincide with the backstairs situation and the real face of WWII?

ideological nationalistic but unfounded and extremely belligerent and war-demanding ideas are not countered but allowed to develop and be established and relayed repeatedly and globally, while they are protected from any counters there is and brims in the thinking, scientific, objective part of the People which is gagged and censored systematically and illegally by everyone, to the level of the censorship of the Junta or McCarthyism of the USA.
The minute, almost dismissible part which promotes the ideological but unfounded, irrational and abusive ideas buys out allies who present a false majority, just like a tiny mouse standing very close to the torchlight makes it so that its shadow is the size of a dinosaur.
the countering from the official matching channels is lukewarm or presented in such a way which in the end supports the adversary.
the People who objectively and rightfully opposes this, is subjected to intimidation and terrorism that if they do not keep silent they will become ‘nationalists’, ‘extreme’, ‘totalitarian’, ‘ludicrous’ and generally culturally inferior and isolated. This fabricated silence, however, is taken as consent by any third party called to watch and draw verdicts (e.g. arbitrators of any type)

We will begin to give specific examples, beginning with the letter of the prime minister of Greece K. Karamanlis, in answer to the baseless and unhistorical demands and claims (almost to the level of an ultimatum) of his counterpart from the country of Skopje and in the next article we will continue with an analysis of the whole coverage and preparation of the events in Meliti, Florina, Greece.

We are linking to the full letter here for space economy. (it is in Greek, but upon finding a translation of it, we will change the link)

In general, the letter states the truth as well as a correct response to the demands of the Skopjan prime minister. However there are specific sentences which deduct power and status from the letter, attributing importance to other agents who have nothing to do with the objective situation and position not only of the facts but also the difference in stature and status of the two sides.


He constantly mentions that Greece is committed (‘bonded’ and therefore liable and in a position not of power but of dependence) to make concessions and back down so that states which Greece has not assumed under its guardianship, nor are they in any official condition of mutuality with Greece beyond the ones that all the countries of the world share with each other, will be able to have international privileges at the expense of Greece who, for some inexplicable and vague reason has been ‘bonded’ to fund without any remuneration beyond that of financial and ethnic impoverishment.

Also, he presented Greece as unilaterally having commited to the keeping of the peace and good neighboring in the Balkans, regardless if the other states there are aggressive and belligerent, investing in processes of embezzlement and arbitrariness in the area. In essence in this way, indirectly but surely he lets the Skopjan country off the hook regarding its obligation to respect the limits of other countries on a land, cultural, historical and anthropological level.

He refers (even with inverted commas) to the issue of ‘Macedonian’ minority saying there is none in Greece. But this implies that there may exist such elsewhere and therefore there exists a ‘Macedonian’ nation, just simply not within Greek borders, giving other leverage to the Skopjan propaganda makers and all who support them. Also, the way which he chooses to deny the existence of the particular ‘minority’ implies that there are other minorities which the Skopjan prime minister mentions in his own letter, which can open up other national matters in Greece (fact which is highly undermining for the peace he professes to be serving).

He urges Skopjan individuals to appeal to specific courts to which people who are oppressed by totalitarian/ absolutist regimes, presenting Greece as such a type of trespasser, which has given the possibility to substantiate a legal case for the taking of lands/ fortunes from the Greeks, instead of showing that such a claim could never hold before any normal court, as is the truth. In essence he gives his consent to Gruevski’s threat to urge the Skopjans to appeal to international courts, actually attempting to equate themselves with real victims of state barbarism such as the Armenians and the Kurds in the Turkish state as well as the Greeks in Northern Epirus (Albania) and in Asia Minor and Constantinople (Instabul) of Turkey, i.e. the victims which have been globally silenced and are not being vindicated ‘for the maintenance of peace and good neighboring’.

Unfortunately the letter of the Greek prime minister ends with the disastrous statement that the prime minister (i.e. the first defender of the Greek Nation according to his rank and title) personally has decided not to serve to the fullest the National rights and interests but instead of that, temporary and international financial/commercial agreements and coalitions/ institutions, characterizing the defending of the Nation and the People as ‘obsolete’ and passed. That is to say, whatever these coalitions/institutions order, he will follow since he is ‘devoted’ to them.

And how should this letter have been so as not to do these things?

Here is the letter as it should have been:

“The Prime Minister of FYROM,


As you know, in order for a country to acquire presence, force and status among an international community which commits to the defense of peace and good neighboring as is underlined by the Security Countil in decision 817, this country is obliged to display respect of the boundaries prescribed not only by common logic and the historic, anthropologic and scientific community but also of the historicity of the existence of the claims of either side.

Your investment in arbitrary and misleading ideas, encouragement and claims to all those who do not have experience of the History of the Balkan peninsula and of its Nations render you in a highly negative light which harms your credibility, since you are trying to embezzle names, history and human potential belonging and having belonged to other Nations, one of which is Greece, in your effort to afford historic background and antiquity to a newly founded small state consisting of a panspermia of Nations and languages.

I am taking advantage of this opportunity to stress to you that Macedonian is a subgroup of the National group of the Hellenes, descending from ancient times with the Hellenic language. The Slavic alphabet is called Cyrillic exactly because its existence is owed to Cyril, a Greek far after Alexander the Great. Cyril, in his effort to acculturate and enlighten more effectively the Slavic raced beyond the limits of Greece, created this script from which benefited several states of the Byzantine era.

Therefore there is no such thing as a Macedonian Language except the Macedonian dialect which is part of the Hellenic one. The individuals to whom you are alluding to correctly as Macedonian are correctly categorized as children of Greece not only from Macedonia, since they are refugees or abducted people from the era of the Greek Civil War and therefore are Hellenes of the Diaspora who, having been persecuted during the totalitarian regime of Tito and were forced to accept a forced and false propaganda. Their children were turned against Mother Greece as they became indoctrinated with propaganda and hate instead of education and peace. This phenomenon had resurfaced in the cases of the Franc and Turkish occupations in Greece, fact, however, which did not characterize its instigators at all positively.


I invite you to honor the support and protection which Greece has afforded you from the resources of her children as well as rise up to the obligations stemming from your ambition to be treated internationally as a modern European state, i.e. have the respect of the pre-existing states and of peace, recanting the unfounded and libelous claims you have made and which are punishable by the authorized International courts and commit yourself from now on to properly educate your People.

History judges the leaders from how they rise to the level of the challenges and assume their responsibilities. Much will depend from your own positive attitude and constructive spirit.”

Wednesday, July 9, 2008

A Good Example

Often in past articles, both here and in my main one ( stigmata ) I have given the theory and basic trajectories of how common logic and hard fact is attacked by emotional violence, propaganda and attempt to dazzle through conjectures and unfounded statements that at best consist of the attacker’s personal and very subjective opinion. Today, I am very pleased to be given the chance to offer a real example that illustrates exactly what is going on and how a Nation is being pushed and prodded to give up what has been always factually, anthropologically and historically obvious to any objective observer.

A person that will not give their proper name, so that we can see the true identity and life ( and therefore estimate the interests this person is serving as well as his / her motivation and capacity ), wrote an answer to this blog, taking a lot of time and space to try and obscure the arguments presented without any counter- argument.

Below I will give the article almost in its entirety, using it as an example to what is going on as the mainstream propaganda Greeks are being brainwashed with and have been for some time.

1. Primarily a person seeking to derail a sound and true fact will attempt to provide information he / she will call evidence of their allegation but in reality is part of a much bigger whole disproving them altogether : The person we are using as an example today provided the following self contradicting but very assertive presentation of ‘ fact’ which is disproven by the evidence provided to support it, as is obvious on a closer careful look :
“UPDATE: Macedonia was in the past regarded by its own inhabitants as a wide geographic region, inhabited by many ethnic groups. In the middle of the 19th Century, the Slavs of Macedonia thought of themselves as “Macedonian Bulgarians“. This is well known, of course: The “Macedonian” ethnic identity of their modern descendants did not exist at the time. This fact is evident e.g. in the front cover of a 19th century book, “Folk songs of the Macedonian Bulgars” by Stefan Verkovic (1860)

On a superficial perusal this seems like a fact. However, it is a methodological mistake when one seeks to prove something scientifically, such as the nature of the inhabitants of “ a wide geographic region” without taking into account that the naming of this wide geographic region from antiquity until today has had many changes none of which included using the name Macedonia to denote anything or anyone not of Greek heritage. Especially the area in question has been named several things of which Macedonia is the most recent political move enforced by a dictator and not the result of age old ethnic identity and the evolving or development of it. Titles of pop culture books which can be named arbitrarily by their authors cannot in any case be evidence of ethnic, historical and anthropological value when history and scientific historical documents of the last three ( 3) centuries at least show otherwise.

It will, however, be fodder for making impressions and political propaganda which will not hold in the scientific community, exactly like Hitler’s invoking of the Arian Race superiority based falsely on some ( not all as should be ) philosophical theories and fabricated scientific evidence based on skull measurements which never did and never will hold on proper scientific scrutiny. He also circulated pamphlets with the prophecies of Nostradamus as sound proof of his claims and even that he did not include in its entirety because Nostradamus was not fully accommodating. Finally, the above example of the 19th century book titled provided, is not mentioned to be part of a Bulgarian political attempt to acquire Greek soil as they have many times since displayed especially during and following the 2 World Wars and therefore does not constitute proof at all of an ethnic identity but of what the attempt to use the particular name in a composite appellation can and will amount to, should it be allowed : attempt for occupation, bloodshed and breaching of Human Rights as was done by the Bulgarians and is still remembered by their victims and their descendents who are still alive.

2. The person seeking to obscure sound and valid arguments may also attempt to present a neutral fact as argument, hoping for the other person’s imagination to fill in the blanks to make it so. For example, in the article we are examining the person says :
“ However, many Greeks and (most) Slavs of today’s (wider) Macedonia are unwilling to accept anyone else being “Macedonian”, than themselves. They both seem to forget that Madeconia has been (for a very long time) a geographic region, rather than an ethnic identity, or a nationality, or an ancient State. E.g.”

The above is a fact. However, it does not prove or even make an indication as to which side is correct. There also a suspicious glossing over of information which is vital in forming an objective and well rounded outlook on the matter by phrases like “ for a very long time” which for the Slavs may amount to seventy (70) years of making such a claiming while for the Greeks it amounts to a few millennia. Also, upon closer scrutiny and content analysis, the above statement implies the animosity that does exist between the holder of a title / name and the contender and the strife that can and will be derived from it if this is not settled properly.
Then, an example is attempted to be offered by this person :

3. The example offered begins as relevant and then goes on at a tangent without sufficient explanation why it is an illustration of the fact it is strung with :
“Mrs. Olga G. Yeritsidou is a Greek psychologist (and a blogger) who declared (in response to rather moderate views I had expressed, in blog-conversation with her ) that… “in Psychology, satire is a manifestation of covert hostility and impotence (or powerlessness)”.
(in Greek, “η σάτιρα… στην ψυχολογία υποδεικνύει κεκαλυμμένη επιθετικότητα και ανημποριά από το άτομο που την εξαπολύει.”)
Well, an ENGLISH post follows, as a critique of the above quote (which is also the post-title in Greek):”

The above quote is irrelevant to the fact the person stated presented in 2. because it is not pertinent to my stance and view of the Skopjan matter but to a scientific estimation according to my application of psychological theories on the function of satire. However, satire and what I think of it has nothing to do with the Skopjan matter but everything, apparently, to do with the reason and motivation of this person’s use of my name as opposed to anyone else’s sharing my views and they are many, regardless of political affiliation, gender and age. It stands to reason because the above statement was made in an effort to make the particular person be serious about a very serious matter instead of using satire which has no purpose ( except to bully someone into remaining silent or goad someone out of a calm and controlled demeanour ) or argumentative value whatsoever.

4. A person that cannot meet another on the objective level with sound arguments will attempt to gag the one he / she cannot counter with threats of tags and branding that this person knows and abhors :
“Mrs. Yeretsidou is an extremely militant advocate of the well known “Macedonia is (only) Greek” hard-line doctrine, which is advocated today only by the Extreme Right in Greek poltiics, even though she does not appear to have any right-wing views (in any other issue than Macedonia)”.

With the above paragraph this person attempts to accuse me or my view as being that of the Junta or any such similar totalitarian and unacceptable regime which is an effort to scare people who are liberal and free spirits to even dare go against mainstream doctrine and propaganda for fear of being branded as what they most hate. He / she also calls me militant ( extremely so ) when everything that is being done is according to the law, the scientific truth and Human Rights. Of course, there is a token nod to the fact that my profile and my writings as well as my family history and personal life conduct is completely opposed to anything totalitarian and as such so do my views upon the Skopjan matter advocate freedom, peace and prosperity for all in the Balkan Peninsula. It will not, however, accommodate interests that are not the vested right of any people. Using a name that is not yours is not a vested right of anyone on any level UNLESS the rightful owner of the name gives you the right to do it.

5. To further obscure and present a person whose arguments cannot be disproven, one can resort to an attempt to ridiculize what the person is saying with a running commentary ( with words like “ wow” and an abundance of suspension points as well as a good helping of irony ) which does not, however, explain why what is being said deserves this ridicule, leaving it again to imagination to fill in the blanks. It also blends irrelevant issues with the relevant ones. For length issues I do not paste the relevant paragraphs but I shall provide the link to the text if anyone is curious.

6. A person will also attempt to misinform and instead of providing objective facts, he / she will instead present the fact in an abundance of descriptive adjectives, anxious to ensure that the reader will not stray from the trajectory this person is setting. For example, though this person does mention that I did not bother to give him / her a history lesson since he / she did not give any indication of being a serious discussion partner, this person fails to mention that I have mentioned the case of the ( official ) naming of the U.K. as U.K. and not Great Britain because France, which possesses the historically coveted by the English region of Bretagne, rightly so opposed to this appellation to protect its territorial rights and prevent further strife. Since this person appears upon content analysis to have knowledge of my views through my blogs ( i.e., has read them ) this is an inaccurate statement on his / her part.

This person also claims not to be a nationalist ( an indirect accusation that my views are extreme since mainstream propaganda portrays Nationalism as equal to Racism with the exception of ethnic badgering between countries during sports events like football events and basketball events ) and by the way he phrases the following, possibly completely uninterested to what any other country can inflict on the land he / she lives in, whether or not he / she is part of the Greek nation. Then the person proceeds to threaten again with a contradictory threat since everyone can call themselves what they want ( according to his / her article ) by stating the following :

“However, I do feel it’s very unjust for Greek Macedonians, to be eventually forced to lose the very term “Macedonia”, which should NOT be the “copyright” of anyone, anymore (I think) within the geographic region of Macedonia: Greek Macedonia, Bulgarian Macedonia, as well as the small part of (wider Geographic) Macedonia that belongs to today’s FYROM.”


7. Then, this person proceeds to fulfil a “promise” to me ( which upon its fulfilment he / she did not in any way let me know, and it was one of my readers who dropped me a note asking me to answer it ) by trying to disprove what I have stated is the true situation regarding the Skopjan matter. Below I will paste all of it and in brackets indicate what is attempted to be achieved by this display :

“1. Macedonia and her name at this moment stand established in theory as well as in action as part/grounds of the country of Hellas (Greece).

No. I am afraid that the term “Macedonia” is now seriously in danger of becoming another country’s copyright, unless we can achieve a compromise about it. [ this is not proof but this person’s opinion which is regurgitated by the media. This is an opinion presented as fact with no support to prove it valid. That another country is claiming the name does not mean that it is not Greek and established as such.]

2. UNLESS ONE BECOMES AN INVADING FORCE THROUGH AN IMPERIALISTIC WAR, nobody can usurp the name, the lands and the history of Macedonia within the law.

No. Nobody would start an imperialistic war (against Greece) for the sake of the word “Macedonia”, although some extremists would like such a war, in BOTH countries (Greece and FYROM). [ this is not proof but this person’s opinion which is regurgitated by the media. This is an opinion presented as fact with no support to prove it valid. That another country is claiming the name does not mean that it is not Greek and established as such. History has proven that war has occurred over this name before, along with moves made by other countries’ dictators.]

3. This legality to usurp can be given ONLY DELIBERATELY AND ONLY BY HELLAS (GREECE) HERSELF.

No. That’s nonsense (or delusions of grandeur and childish omnipotence). Our problem is completely different: That the other side refuses to bargain. [ This is an attempt to ridiculize and inexplicably characterise what is a valid and provable fact. What is provided as an answer is not proof or argument but this person’s opinion. This is an opinion presented as fact with no support to prove it valid. That another country is claiming the name does not mean that it is not Greek and established as such, which is why arbitration by the U.N. is taking place and why NATO accepted it.]

CONSEQUENTLY IT IS BEING ENFORCED ON GREEKS THREATENING (of the type: ‘we made wrong moves/ we are bound by political agreements/ we will be isolated/ there will be war’) AND MANIPULATION OF DIFFERENT MANNER (of the type: ‘you are fanatics/nationalists/ cruel/ hard/ historically uneducated/ etc’) SO THAT WE WILL WILLINGLY AND ON OUR OWN GIVE THIS LEGALITY WHICH IS LACKING FROM THE CLAIMS OF THE STATE OF SKOPJE.

Nope. I’m afraid that sounds like paranoid bulshit. It also doesn’t make much sense (in English)… [ this is another attempt to characterise without backing up with arguments the characterisation. The derogatory nature of the characterisation indicates anger, helplessness to disprove the statement and pent up aggression on that person’s part. It usually takes place when a person is cornered and out of arguments, constituting an attempt to derail from the objective to the subjective personal levels. It also displays a poor knowledge of the English syntax ( however unusual ) but this is particular to this person and not the general strategy this person is using.]

IF WE ACCEPT ANY KIND OF NAME CONTAINING THE TERM ‘MACEDONIA’ (that is, if we compromise as we are being pressured to do) :

No. If we can achieve an agreement safeguarding the rights of Greek Macedonians, then no claims and demands can ever again be justified. If -on the other hand- we stubbornly insist on a name that does not even contain the word “Macedonia”, then the other side will never agree to this! So, emotionally (and otherwise) we will then acquire an eternal enemy, thereby legalising the other side’s claims and demands, ever worsening, as time passes. [ This is again all conjectural and lacking the common knowledge that when you give in to an irrational and unjust claim you simply indicate that the one who claimed it should have asked for more.]


No. It is our historic obligation to achieve a peaceful compromise with those Slavic people whose presence in our own country (as well as other regions of the Balkans) was just as valid as our own, once upon a time. But we do have to give up psychological denial: Denial of the fact that they were just as native within the wider geographic region of Macedonia just as our own (native) Greek Macedonians. [ This lacks historical documentation and it is an insult to the men and women we honour in our National Anniversaries who obviously did not think they were obligated to give up what was rightfully theirs and shed their blood to keep it. It is also ethnic slander because it does not indicate how any Slavic or other people coming to reside in Greece became absorbed by the indigenous population instead of forming minorities as is being implied here. ]


No. This extremist attitude is advocated ONLY by the Extreme Right (in Greece), today. ALL other political parties have agreed on a moderate stance (of a composite name containing the word “Macedonia”) instead. [ This is not argument disproving or proving anything except an unacceptable attempt to compartmentalise pluralism of opinion into what political parties say. It also is a greater disrespect to any individual, Greek or not, as it is implying an incapacity of individuals to be able to think critically and instead relying on party politics to form an opinion. Also, an opinion is not copyright to a political party. Anyone can have it and in the same time not be part of it or use it in the way the alluded to party is, which is not in any way in the interests of the true Greek people. ]


No. Such war (although at the moment unlikely) can happen anyway, regardless of how the other side is called officially. As a matter of fact, war-like sentiments are likely to increase on both sides, if an agreement is not reached that saves the dignity of both. [ Again this is an unfounded opinion without any argumentative support. ]


No. There is nobody to liberate (unless the tiny minority of Macedonian Slavs in Greece is overestimated by our own… paranoid national imagination). [ Again this is an unfounded opinion without any argumentative support. It also is another attempt to ridiculize. ]


No. Only if a reasonable compromise is not mutually accepted, hostile feelings can get the chance of being cultivated in both countries, against each other; certainly not helpful for Peace. [ Again this is an unfounded opinion without any argumentative support. Peace is achieved when everyone’s boundaries are extremely clear. Any parent with two children is aware of this fact. ]

No, Absolutely Not True: We have ALREADY compromised. It’s now the OTHER side’s obligation, to respect this compromise, and respond to it…”
[ Again this is an unfounded opinion without any argumentative support. Without a National referendum the diplomatic strategy followed only reflects the opinions and interests served by anyone else except the Greek people. ]

This person rambles on and on in the same way which is typical and identical and falling in the obscuring strategies discussed and illustrated. Time and length do not allow me to continue reiterating how so called statements this person makes are unfounded / slanted / misleading or simple attempts to ridiculize or call names. Any person interested can do that on their own time by following the link I will provide at the end of the article. I will finish today’s illustration of how opinion leaders attempt to intimidate those with critical thinking and objective thought while hiding behind a pseudoname which grants them impunity and the capacity to argue for both sides depending on where the wind blows, with this fine specimen :

“So, an uncompromising attitude, that depends on the highly arrogant, irrational premise that we can dictate to another independent nation how to call themselves, is justified and sanctified as an absolute logical prerequisite for Peace in our region; Not only peace, but for the very integrity of Greece (keeping our nation “intact”). (wow…)
I.e. Mrs. Yeretsidou imagines that as soon as a certain small neighbouring country is officially recognised internationally as “Macedonia” (without any adjective or any geographic qualification) then the path towards instability, war and the destruction of the Greek nation will follow, as an inescapable logical consequence!
-How paranoid! Well, 120 countries have already accepted FYROM as “Republic of Macedonia” and there have been no such evil consequences!”

It is easy to detect all the stratagems : false characterisation ( arrogant, irrational premise when the premise is defendable by law and Human Rights ), unfounded claims ( that we cannot and apparently should not prevent another country from calling itself something that is ours, not as is attempted to be presented dictating in general what the name should be ) and gratuitous name calling ( paranoid, arrogant, etc ) without the presentation of a single argument except of the typical manipulator’s tenet “ THAT’S WHAT EVERYONE WANTS”( if 120 countries have accepted it it does not mean we must, as the country of the U.S.A. has displayed often on environmental and other issues including Human Rights and Nuclear Weapons while everyone else – literally- abides by them. It also is not important how many countries have accepted something but if the crucial ones within the matter – in this case Greece, as the power of the veto displayed – have ).

Link to all of the article, as promised: