The Preannouncement of the True Developments in the Basic Issues of Greece with Turkey and Skopje

By now, for every thinking person, all the plan of the foreign policy that is going to be imposed on the Hellenic Nation and State by George Papandreou, if of course he is allowed to remain in the PM seat, has been rendered clear. His signs of action have been given anew, repeatedly and clearly based his positioning on issues and subjects that share common ground or points with the ones we are dealing with as well as with those that are very likely going to occur, out of the blue for the Citizens who naively and in trust no foreign affairs minister or after-junta PM has earned, do not watch out for the hints G. Papandreou is giving and the principles he says he is following. It is however, not going to be out of the blue, but expected for the Citizens with an analytic mind and critical thought.

We call a sign of future action positioning and acts which are basic enough and generalizable enough (that is, we can draw a rule of behavior a person will follow for all occasions sharing the same parameters) and for which acts no differentiating factor or uniqueness has been made. They are, therefore, the behavioral motifs that are continually repeated no matter what the person engaging in them claims in word.

Especially in the frame of entire states, a sign of future action is that which everyone looks out for to arrange their own course and the dealings they will have towards the state or the leader displaying it.

In the particular case of G. Papandreou, several signs of future action were given in his previous runs in basic administrative positions (as vital as the ministry of foreign affairs which he holds now, too) but we don’t even need those todemonstrate that the behavior and direction for which he had been voted down back then is the same he is swiftly following now, while he can and while communicationally (not actually) he falsely claims his government is Popular and is representing the Hellenic People (see the qualitative analysis and true interpretation of the election results).

In the current analysis we will demonstrate how in two speeches and one comment as well as with his presence and approval he indirectly but definitely announced to us what he is going to do not only in the issue of the Skopjan claim (the name as well as the lands and possession and historicity of Macedonia being Greek) but also in the Greek-Turkish issues, and not only the Cyprian aspect of them.

Before we mention how and where each step and each indirect announcement lies, we will show the common denominators with which one can locate such indirect announcements, not only in his speech in the inter-Balkan meeting but also in his statements regarding the signing of the agreement between Turkey and Armenia.

ON THE MACEDONIAN ISSUE

1. the case of Skopje is full of claims historicity and demand to rewrite History so that a usurping of the Hellenic character of Macedonia and a deletion of all the historic events mentioning heroic actions but also huge crimes of war against Humans at the expense of the Greeks living/staying/ coming from Macedonia, the Macedonians, will occur.

2. the case of Skopje also tries to substantiate a false and twisted legal ground using Human Rights to promote and legalise the breaching of the Human Rights of other populations and especially Hellenic ones.

3. the case of Skopje leans on the claim that in favour of material/ developmental and international ‘well being’ as well as stability, objectivity must be sacrificed in favour of blatant forging of all evidence, proof and uncontestable legal and Humanitarian/ Historical Rights of anyone with whom this formation borders and which is simply supported by the forces the governments of the USA represent.


ON THE GRECO-TURKISH ISSUE

1. Turkey is based on arbitrary breaches which become status quo in order to legalize essentially illegal claims on the grounds of shows of power supported by those who have always, historically, supported her (USA, UK, Germany and at times France and Russia) both as Ottoman Empire and later as the supervisor of her older fractured provinces and current typically independent states.

2. Turkey is based on false legal grounds that can be shot down, regarding Human Rights. She systematically denies the historicity of her own crimes against Humanity, such as the Armenian genocide, the Asia Minor Hellenes genocide, the Hellenes of the Pontos genocides, the genocide of those of Constantinople as well as other populations presenting a danger of weakening Turkey, presenting her as a mosaic of Peoples rather than a single unified People, just as the case is with Skopje and the USA. But the USA cover their weakness through a different propaganda through the ages.

3. Turkey is based on her casus belli threats to convince her adversaries to cooperate, as indirectly yet clearly via the distancing and avoidance to have these threats condemned by the UN, EU, NATO, etc, it is shown that Turkey will have war support by third powerful parties (fact which is not at all ensured if war was truly to take place, since much more is at stake and much more lucrative conditions throughout Europe would be threatened, as we will analyze in future articles), and thus an adversary of Turkey would have more to deal with than the quality of the Turkish army.


On closing we must mention that Skopje as well as Turkey fervently wish to acquire EU membership as then (and if such a membership is given without stipulations on population mobility) it will be very easy within a short amount of time to fragment Greece with excuses of the type of Cyprus, and these fragments will never again be reunited.

HOW GEORGE PAPANDREOU IS GOING TO DEAL DISASTROUS BLOWS TO GREECE AND THE GREEKS BASED ON HIS OWN POSITIONING

The current PM and Foreign Affairs minister has stated the following on how he stands regarding the Hellenic position in Europe and the Balkans:

1. from his speech on 2009/10/09 in the informal meeting: “we ought to continue to transform Europe and our fears, fears on the change of borders or minorities must be evaporated so that we will build relationships of respect in the frame of our differences.”

2. from his statements in the same speech on Skopje: “regarding our other neighbor in the North, Skopje, we share common interests, wanting to see our area prosper, be stable and safe.”

3. in the same speech on Turkey: “I believe in the prospect of [Turkey] becoming a full member and I will work to this end in the European Union.”

4. from his statements in Constantinople on the same day: “we ought to free Cyprus from dependencies on her mother land. We ought to free Cyprus from the occupation forces. We ought to free Cyprus from divisions and walls that have no place in the European Union.”

5. from his salutation in the agreement of Turkey-Armenia on 2009/10/11: “I welcome this historic agreement for the amelioration of relations between Turkey and Armenia and I hail the effort and political volition in which the two leaders invest in order to overcome differences and to work in favour of security and stability in the area which is to the interest of everyone.”

The above quotes should already have shown the alignment and devotion of G. Papandreou and the undermining he hopes to continue to perform in the countryjust like the former minister of Foreign Affairs D. Bakogiannis of the Karamanlis government, in the same speed and impudence, but we will analyze them one by one:

Regarding the salutation in the agreement between Turkey-Armenia, we must bear in mind that with this agreement, the Armenian Foreign Affairs minister Edward Nalbandian (whom the Armenians are called traitor and threaten with death) accepted to hush and allow for no recognition and any step towards rectification, apology and reimbursement the genocide of the Armenians and he UNILATERALLY ACCEPTED TO OPEN THE BORDERS OF ARMENIA WHEN TURKEY DID NOT DO THE SAME.

That is, G. Papandreou hailed a blatant breach of Human Rights and the global cover up of one of the most heinous war crimes against Humanity (while for much less generals and leaders have been very recently executed), in essence saying that he is willing to sacrifice the millions of victims, their families, their Rights on lands and fortunes stolen in favour of an uncertain prosperity that is not précised whose it will be (the big capital holders’ of the energy sources or the People’s) and for peace that at any time is threatened by the very same instigator of that genocide. After this huge treason by the Armenian Foreign Affairs minister, the criminals and murderers demanded further more profit land-wise to be extracted from their victims who accepted to swallow their annihilation.

When, therefore, the same happens not only with Cyprus which is already programmed as it seems from quotes on Cyprus we presented but also with the Aegean and Thrace, what is the sign of future action G. Papandreou has given on the policy he will follow? Not only will he sign whatever the Turkish representative asks him to, giving away whatever he is ordered to give away by the assorted USA representative (exactly like Hillary Clinton ordered the Armenian to sign immediately without any demand and he obeyed), he won’t even have the tight expression of his Armenian counterpart, but he will be smiling more widely than the Turk, unless of course he is fearing for his life like the Armenian is.

We should note that especially to the Armenians, the USA President Obama had promised a recognition of the genocide before he was elected, but after his election he sent his foreign affairs minister to order them to denounce their history and shame their dead and their ancestors on their own. G. Papandreou, who so openly pledges allegiance and loyalty to the USA, to the point that he refers to his office as ‘the oval office’, will fully obey the American foreign affairs minister as her employee, which explains his hurried move to be present and offer assurances on his position the true overseer of the USA in the Balkans, Turkey.

When the matching thing happens from Skopje with matching threats by them of ‘destabilization’ and even war as they have already begun to half-whisper, as well as threats for financial death (although the only one who can threaten Skopje with something like that is us), according to his above statements and according to how he saw to it that he applauds the degradation and shaming of Armenia (while others with more risks to take than Greece did not do that), he will accept to sign anything in the name of ‘peace and economic prosperity’ in essence giving away to Skopje any right demanded of him by the representative of USA, trampling on our National existence, historicity and dignity.

At this point we must mention that a movement for Greece in the international academic and scientific sector is gradually but very consistently and increasingly rising based on many scientific fields, staggeringly much evidence, technical essays and titled signatures (in the academic world whatever you sign directly reflects on your credibility as a scientist, therefore nobody signs anything they cannot be sure or of does not have the guarantee of political/ capital holder cover which does not seem to be occurring in this case), which has manifested in the form of an official letter to the USA president Obama (the Obama letter) for Greece and against Skopje. How can he, who seems to continually seek the aid of foreign scientists, does not seize the opportunity to use more than 300 top authorities on the exact issues of populations, history and historicity to demonstrate that Skopje should be named what they want except ‘Macedonia’ and other offshoots of that?

The question will be officially posted in this manner in an official inquiry to G. Papandreou, who is required by Law to answer. Unfortunately, it is certain to any thinking person that the answer is simply that G. Papandreou has promised loyalty and obedience to a different flag than the Greek one, to whom he has sworn, and that he obeys other taskmasters than those who pay him according to the Constitution, i.e. us: he obeys those (big capital holders and progeny of ancient power-wielding dynasties) who pay and oversee so that the USA government is the world government.

Everything in our analysis can be substantiated not only by G. Papandreou’s current action but also with his former one and that of his political party since its foundation. Also, all this is historically substantiated and for one more time it is shown that while Greece has many Rights nobody can deny her, she either loses them because she relies without assurances on the words of the assorted ‘ally’ (that all Foreign Affairs ministers urge us to bow to without dignity or reward) or because she relies on politicians like G. Papandreou and K. Karamanlis and their peers who historically have led us not only to financial but also National/ international disaster.
We as Citizens act against all anti-Hellenic strategies and with a current letter from the EU to us personally (which clearly simply seeks to gain time before having no choice but officially taking a stance on our questions) we were given access to communicate to the one ‘responsible’ to state the EU stance on the Skopjan matter as we phrase it in our declaration (see the initial post of this blog), an answer than may be sent within the famous 100 day period (as an EU representative will press for the inclusion of Skopje in the EU regardless of its name) tous or may not be sent at all before we legally demand it, as it will force the EU to stop keeping the ‘neutrality’ it illegally is falling back on now

Promotional Messages

When a known Roman emperor said ‘The emperor’s wife should not only be honest, but also look honest’ that which he actually meant was that the importance of the presentation of issues is just as important with the essence of these issues. That is, a big percentage of the events and reactions taking place in global current events do not stem from the essence of things but from how ‘righteous-like’ the situation is allowed to be shown.

That is to say?

That is to say, somebody has the capacity to acquire the so-called ‘window of opportunity’ to go on to take some action, regardless if later it is proven that this somebody’s allegations were unfounded and abusive and he/she destroyed fortunes, lives and esteems unfairly with his/her actions.

This window of opportunity is created by a network of promotional messages which are threadbare but flashy, broadcasted by specific sources which protect these messages from counter-argument messages that would shoot them down immediately and show them to be ridiculous. So, actions take place which afterwards, like dominoes lead to other actions until a result is achieved which otherwise would be impossible to reach.

So history is constructed and things that should never have happened, given common opinion at the time before the spreading of specific promotional messages. Later history analysts just mention in brief how the people was ‘fooled’, ‘waylaid’, ‘enraged’, ‘maddened’ etc.

That which they do not analyze is why the people fell into those mindsets all of a sudden when just before they were calm or methodically progressing towards a specific trajectory (or improvement or deterioration depending on the era) based on the facts they were dealing with on a daily basis. Historic examples include the propaganda of Hitler, of the Ku Klux Klan, or the USA constitution regarding its coloured inhabitants towards the end of the 19th and during the 20th century, as well as during the beginning of the Greek civil war in 1947.

In all these occasions, wrong messages terrorized the People regarding certain groups within it and turned one against the other or towards war with other nations. These wars were completely imposed and the only thing they achieved was to eradicate a large percentage of the human potential of the People which in reality crippled the People ideologically, socially and financially.

In the case of the Skopjan issue now, we have an identical process of twisting and intimidation which leads to the same situations we just described. This process is the result of two cooperating group of forced which have nothing to do with the objective situation of the People of either side and their wishes.

What do we mean by that?

We mean that in the propaganda taking place we have once side which is ranting and raving that it is being wronged and oppressed and the other side, which remains silent or answers in a manner which leaves room for doubt. This, in Physics, is called a ‘force system’ which means that two forces cooperate to turn a lever, or move something heavy (the muscles of the body use the rules of the force system to move the members: one muscle pulls while the other relaxes).

With this system of forces the People is moved, from their default wish for peace and calm, to be fanatized and become violent, wishing for war. This has happened historically countless times with the most obvious example being that of the Second World War, where, from the ‘never again’ motto they had said in the end of WWI they were led and in essence forced to take part in an even worse bloodshed: The German People with the promotional messages of Hitler’s staff, which were very carefully designed (starting from liberal and proper ideas and very gradually evolving into nazist ideas of totalitarianism and genocide, a process which took two decades to mature and in which high profile people from the fields of philosophy, science, the arts and not just from Hitler’s staff contributed actively), and the rest of the Peoples with an inertness and denial (due to the assuaging and other distracting events which were designed to take Peoples’ attention away from the danger which grew and lurked) to realize during these two decades that the ideology dominant in Germany of the time (with the protests, the cultural events, the declarations and the demarches) was leading with mathematical accuracy to a war eruption.

Are you saying there was a cooperation of the leaderships of the states of that time towards the instigation of WWII?

For certain there was a force system which pushed the People to it, very consciously as it can be surmised and proven scientifically, technocratically and objectively from many things, one of which is the free and fully coordinated exchange and co-production of news reports and documentaries which misinformed or fanatized both sides, as well as the financial support of Germany by countries of the Allied front, so that Germany would continue having equipment and armed forced during the preparation and conducting of the WWII at least until its first half.

All this can be proven and are documented in international bibliography (e.g. the special technology developed by IBM for the filing and processing of the data of each one individual of the countless Jews, Gypsies and ideologically opposing people so that their eradication in the gas chambers could take place in full organization and controlled knowledge of even the history of each person that was chosen by computer to be put to death, have fortune taken, etc. The same goes for other technologies that made Hitler’s purging would be much more effective than they could have been if forces from the Allies’ side did not equip him and leave the money flow free towards him.)

And how does the Skopjan issue coincide with the backstairs situation and the real face of WWII?

ideological nationalistic but unfounded and extremely belligerent and war-demanding ideas are not countered but allowed to develop and be established and relayed repeatedly and globally, while they are protected from any counters there is and brims in the thinking, scientific, objective part of the People which is gagged and censored systematically and illegally by everyone, to the level of the censorship of the Junta or McCarthyism of the USA.
The minute, almost dismissible part which promotes the ideological but unfounded, irrational and abusive ideas buys out allies who present a false majority, just like a tiny mouse standing very close to the torchlight makes it so that its shadow is the size of a dinosaur.
the countering from the official matching channels is lukewarm or presented in such a way which in the end supports the adversary.
the People who objectively and rightfully opposes this, is subjected to intimidation and terrorism that if they do not keep silent they will become ‘nationalists’, ‘extreme’, ‘totalitarian’, ‘ludicrous’ and generally culturally inferior and isolated. This fabricated silence, however, is taken as consent by any third party called to watch and draw verdicts (e.g. arbitrators of any type)


We will begin to give specific examples, beginning with the letter of the prime minister of Greece K. Karamanlis, in answer to the baseless and unhistorical demands and claims (almost to the level of an ultimatum) of his counterpart from the country of Skopje and in the next article we will continue with an analysis of the whole coverage and preparation of the events in Meliti, Florina, Greece.

We are linking to the full letter here for space economy. (it is in Greek, but upon finding a translation of it, we will change the link)

In general, the letter states the truth as well as a correct response to the demands of the Skopjan prime minister. However there are specific sentences which deduct power and status from the letter, attributing importance to other agents who have nothing to do with the objective situation and position not only of the facts but also the difference in stature and status of the two sides.

Specifically:

He constantly mentions that Greece is committed (‘bonded’ and therefore liable and in a position not of power but of dependence) to make concessions and back down so that states which Greece has not assumed under its guardianship, nor are they in any official condition of mutuality with Greece beyond the ones that all the countries of the world share with each other, will be able to have international privileges at the expense of Greece who, for some inexplicable and vague reason has been ‘bonded’ to fund without any remuneration beyond that of financial and ethnic impoverishment.

Also, he presented Greece as unilaterally having commited to the keeping of the peace and good neighboring in the Balkans, regardless if the other states there are aggressive and belligerent, investing in processes of embezzlement and arbitrariness in the area. In essence in this way, indirectly but surely he lets the Skopjan country off the hook regarding its obligation to respect the limits of other countries on a land, cultural, historical and anthropological level.

He refers (even with inverted commas) to the issue of ‘Macedonian’ minority saying there is none in Greece. But this implies that there may exist such elsewhere and therefore there exists a ‘Macedonian’ nation, just simply not within Greek borders, giving other leverage to the Skopjan propaganda makers and all who support them. Also, the way which he chooses to deny the existence of the particular ‘minority’ implies that there are other minorities which the Skopjan prime minister mentions in his own letter, which can open up other national matters in Greece (fact which is highly undermining for the peace he professes to be serving).

He urges Skopjan individuals to appeal to specific courts to which people who are oppressed by totalitarian/ absolutist regimes, presenting Greece as such a type of trespasser, which has given the possibility to substantiate a legal case for the taking of lands/ fortunes from the Greeks, instead of showing that such a claim could never hold before any normal court, as is the truth. In essence he gives his consent to Gruevski’s threat to urge the Skopjans to appeal to international courts, actually attempting to equate themselves with real victims of state barbarism such as the Armenians and the Kurds in the Turkish state as well as the Greeks in Northern Epirus (Albania) and in Asia Minor and Constantinople (Instabul) of Turkey, i.e. the victims which have been globally silenced and are not being vindicated ‘for the maintenance of peace and good neighboring’.

Unfortunately the letter of the Greek prime minister ends with the disastrous statement that the prime minister (i.e. the first defender of the Greek Nation according to his rank and title) personally has decided not to serve to the fullest the National rights and interests but instead of that, temporary and international financial/commercial agreements and coalitions/ institutions, characterizing the defending of the Nation and the People as ‘obsolete’ and passed. That is to say, whatever these coalitions/institutions order, he will follow since he is ‘devoted’ to them.

And how should this letter have been so as not to do these things?

Here is the letter as it should have been:

“The Prime Minister of FYROM,

Sir,

As you know, in order for a country to acquire presence, force and status among an international community which commits to the defense of peace and good neighboring as is underlined by the Security Countil in decision 817, this country is obliged to display respect of the boundaries prescribed not only by common logic and the historic, anthropologic and scientific community but also of the historicity of the existence of the claims of either side.

Your investment in arbitrary and misleading ideas, encouragement and claims to all those who do not have experience of the History of the Balkan peninsula and of its Nations render you in a highly negative light which harms your credibility, since you are trying to embezzle names, history and human potential belonging and having belonged to other Nations, one of which is Greece, in your effort to afford historic background and antiquity to a newly founded small state consisting of a panspermia of Nations and languages.

I am taking advantage of this opportunity to stress to you that Macedonian is a subgroup of the National group of the Hellenes, descending from ancient times with the Hellenic language. The Slavic alphabet is called Cyrillic exactly because its existence is owed to Cyril, a Greek far after Alexander the Great. Cyril, in his effort to acculturate and enlighten more effectively the Slavic raced beyond the limits of Greece, created this script from which benefited several states of the Byzantine era.

Therefore there is no such thing as a Macedonian Language except the Macedonian dialect which is part of the Hellenic one. The individuals to whom you are alluding to correctly as Macedonian are correctly categorized as children of Greece not only from Macedonia, since they are refugees or abducted people from the era of the Greek Civil War and therefore are Hellenes of the Diaspora who, having been persecuted during the totalitarian regime of Tito and were forced to accept a forced and false propaganda. Their children were turned against Mother Greece as they became indoctrinated with propaganda and hate instead of education and peace. This phenomenon had resurfaced in the cases of the Franc and Turkish occupations in Greece, fact, however, which did not characterize its instigators at all positively.

Sir,

I invite you to honor the support and protection which Greece has afforded you from the resources of her children as well as rise up to the obligations stemming from your ambition to be treated internationally as a modern European state, i.e. have the respect of the pre-existing states and of peace, recanting the unfounded and libelous claims you have made and which are punishable by the authorized International courts and commit yourself from now on to properly educate your People.

History judges the leaders from how they rise to the level of the challenges and assume their responsibilities. Much will depend from your own positive attitude and constructive spirit.”